Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Facebook’

A final thought on that Osbaldeston Lecture. Then I promise I will move on to something else.

Social media is today’s contact sport and the sooner governments understand this new form of communication the better. What better way to let people know what is happening in your department or Ministry than by posting a blog or creating an interactive information site? How better to receive input and feedback on policies that are being developed or considered? If you question this approach, I beg you to visit a university or college campus and watch what students are focused on, how they process information, access data, and interpret their world. It will provide you with an up-dated definition of “contact”.

You don’t actually have to go to a university campus — rather, you only need to watch Michael Wesch’s classic “Vision of Students Today” video:

Of course, it’s not only about the students is it? Many (most?) people are now moving in this direction, focusing our attention on streams of content via social networks.

Example, in keeping with the Facebook mentions in the video: percentage-wise, what’s the fastest growing demographic on the world’s largest social network? Women over 55, followed by women 45-55 (U.S. data from October 2009). Overall, “nearly 50% of Facebook users in the US today are over 35.”

(Sorry no recent Canuck specific data, is it out there?)

 

Read Full Post »

A bit late on blogging this, but anyhow.

Last week there were a couple of stories in the Ottawa Citizen (on Thursday and Friday) that touched on impartiality in the federal public service.

From the Friday story, titled Internet age a challenge to impartial public service:

The commission [ie, the PSC] concluded the young PCO analyst who posted his support for the Liberal party had crossed the line with “improper political activity,” but found no evidence that this affected his ability to do his job.

The employee wasn’t disciplined for his Facebook entry other than receiving a letter from the commission warning against “political activities” that could undermine his ability to do his job impartially — or leave that impression.

The unnamed bureaucrat wasn’t a senior executive but he did work for PCO, which has a more politically sensitive mandate than other departments.

Some thoughts:

1. Tempting to write this off as a PCO thing, since life is different at “the centre.” But that would be a mistake — especially for people working in communications and marketing, as we routinely bump up against the political/administrative divide in government. Impartiality is important throughout the bureaucracy.

2. Nor is it an age thing — leaving aside the fact that “young PCO analyst” is pretty ambigous, it is clear that social networking is increasingly popular among all workplace demographics.

3. In one sense, nothing has changed. Listing your political affiliation on a social networking site is analogous to wearing a party badge or political button on your coat. If you want to be seen as impartial, don’t do it.

4. Social networks like make it all too easy for this kind of thing to happen. When I signed up for Facebook, I remember that the “political affiliation” question was part of the registration process. Incredibly easy for an inattentive user to pick something that they will later regret since their focus is on getting signed up.

5. Yes social networking is redrawing the line between public/private. My rule of thumb – err on the side of caution and treat online participation as more public than private. I assume that how I present yourself online always has a an impact on my personal reputation and the reputation of my employer. (Writing this, it occurs to me that it’s probably no different in the private sector.) By the by, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner has been doing great work on privacy issues around social networking.

6. As cases like these start to pile up, it will be tempting to simply block off the social web in government workplaces. This would be a mistake, as not only would business value be lost, but it would just drive the activity “underground.” People will find a way regardless — so better to encourage responsible use than to make people do it behind your back. The recently reanimated StopBlocking.org has great info on why it’s better to allow your people access.

7. On policy: I don’t feel that new rules need to be invented. There’s enough policy out there already. I am in favour of education and guidance though — to help us navigate through this new and unfamiliar terrain. Whether in terms of reminding employees of their responsibilities as public servants or by having early adopters and leaders showing us how it’s done. Or creating a touchstone of some sort that interprets existing rules in the light of new realities presented by the social web (for this last one, I’m looking at you TBS).

Read Full Post »

wiC_fblogoAbout a year ago, I blogged about the Working in Canada initiative as a great example of the Government of Canada doing government 2.0 — it’s a mashup that pulls together info trapped in widely spread out databases and delivers it in a way that helps prospective or new Canadians make informed decisions about where to live and work within the country.

Well since that time, the Working in Canada gang has also jumped into social media, with presences on Twitter (in the usual English and French, but also Mandarin) and Facebook.

One of the coolest things about their Facebook presence? They are interacting rather than just broadcasting. Here’s a screencap:

Example of interaction on Facebook

Example of interaction on Facebook

From what I see, the Working in Canada Facebook page is developing into a hub where people are asking questions not just about the Working in Canada tool, but wider questions about coming to Canada as well. And they are getting answers — the Working in Canada folks are pointing these people to relevant information sources, regardless of whether they specifically pertain to the Working in Canada program or not. Nice work!

Read Full Post »

I got curious about this question when reading the comments Mathew Ingram’s recent post on social networks and uptime. Mathew noted the curious case of Twitter, which is the social network “that everyone wants to use” despite it’s near-legendary struggles with downtime last year. Another commenter asserted that Imeem was actually more popular than Twitter (really? hmmm, maybe that comment was planted by Imeem).

Anyhow, this got me thinking about ways of measuring popularity. I could have easily just looked up traffic stats for social networks on compete.com, but that’s too straightforward.

Instead, I turned to my favorite quick-and-dirty buzz tracker – Neilsen’s BlogPulse. After all, a reasonable way to measure something’s popularity is to look at how much it’s being talked about. Tracking blogosphere mentions of social networks also removes the bias inherent in tracking mentions on the social networks themselves.

So I punched a few keywords into BlogPulse. Here’s their track of blogosphere mentions of Twitter, Facebook and MySpace over the last 2 months:

Facebook still gets more mentions than Twitter

Facebook still gets more mentions than Twitter, MySpace getting less attention

Facebook’s recent spike no doubt due to the terms of service kerfuffle. Funny, the Facebook and Twitter lines seem to rise and fall in lockstep with each other — I guess there’s a lot of posts out there comparing these two. (Like this one.) And it looks like people have pretty much stopped talking about MySpace in the last few weeks, despite healthy chatter before Xmas.

Here’s another one, to test that assertion about Imeem in comparison with attention hogs Facebook and Twitter.

Imeem? Did somebody mention Imeem?

Imeem? Did somebody mention Imeem?

Ha ha, looks like almost nobody at all is talking about Imeem. I guess bloggers don’t like music or something.

Read Full Post »

(Video podcast from the Government of Canada’s AfCam channel on YouTube)

The other day, a colleague brought the AfCam project to my attention. What is AfCam? It’s “Afghanistan Camera” – a federal government social media project in support of Canada’s work in Afghanistan. I believe it’s led by CIDA.

Here’s the blurb from the AfCam home page on the “Canada’s Engagement in Afghanistan” website:

Welcome to AfCam, a look at Canada’s engagement in Afghanistan through photos, videos, and sounds. View our feature gallery and podcast by clicking below, or search the database by clicking in the box to the right.

Stay updated by subscribing to AfCam on social media channels like Flickr, YouTube, and iTunes.

I just love seeing the words “social media channels like Flickr, YouTube, and iTunes” on a GoC web page. This is great initiative – using images, sound and video content is a fantastic way to complement (or supplant) the usual text-centric government communications products online, whether press releases or publications etc. And the social nature of these tools makes it a lot easier to spread this content around. So I love seeing it out there.

One of the challenges of using these disparate channels is tying it all together — and the AfCam page does a nice job of this. In addition to the photos and videos themselves, the page prominently points to the various AfCam outposts on YouTube, Flickr, Facebook and iTunes. (And I wonder if this is the first use of these logos on a federal website?) There’s an RSS feed buried at the bottom also. I would have taken advantage of the RSS autodiscovery technique for this, but no matter.

But what if you come at AfCam via one of these other channels? The Facebook page is essentially a mirror of the content from the AfCam page on http://www.afghanistan.gc.ca — the photos from the Flickr photostream are posted there, the RSS feed items are there and the videos have been uploaded also. Interestingly, most of videos have been included via the FB YouTube app rather than being uploaded directly (although there’s English and French overview videos posted using FB’s native video app). And the photos are also posted directly to the page rather than being pulled from Flickr via that’s site’s FB app.

The YouTube and Flickr channels are much more rudimentary — a lot of this has to do with the limitations inherent in those platforms. There’s not a lot of room for cross-linking or pointing to AfCam’s other presences from either of these. The focus is squarely on the videos and the photos respectively; context be damned. But on Flickr for instance, I’m thinking that more detail should be added to the AFCam profile page, which could point to the YouTube channel or the Facebook page or back to the page on http://www.afghanistan.gc.ca.

Aside: I noticed also that the Flickr photos were all marked as copyrighted. I’ll bet they are the work of professional photogs who want to retain their copyright, but wouldn’t it be nice to see these with creative commons licensing to facilitate sharing?

Aside #2: I noticed that the videos embedded on the main AFCam page are using what looks like the accessible media player mandated by the GoC – I couldn’t find the transcripts however. Posting up a text transcript would complete the accessibility solution.

Read Full Post »

Spotted in Sunday’s G&M:

Maggie Fox on how hard it is to do market research on Facebook:

“I don’t want to know who, I just want to know what. I don’t need to take it down to the level of what Joe Blow says, I want to know what people are talking about generally. It is almost impossible to extract data from Facebook around who’s talking about what and whether it’s a favourable or negative conversation without doing it manually,” Ms. Fox said.

The marketer in me feels her pain. The research is painstaking! Who’s got the time or the money to have some poor sod sit there flipping through FB profiles and pages…. But the Facebook user in me figgers that “the trouble with Facebook” from a marketing point of view is probably a good thing.

The problem is that there are others less reputable than the Social Media Group who do in fact want to take it down to the level of what Joe Blow Peter Smith says, where he clicks, who his contacts are and what data he’s entering online. Phishing, spamming and all that naughty stuff. Let’s build a widget that secretly scapes all my profile data right?

If it weren’t for these types (and some of them work for companies that I buy crap from, I can just feel it when I go through my inbox or snail mail), I’d be all cool with letting Maggie & her gang collect more data.

In a perfect world, right?

Aside: that quote seems a bit slipshod the more I look at it — at first she says I don’t want to know who, but then she mentions that she would in fact like to know who‘s talking about what — hoping she was misquoted …

Read Full Post »

A little over a week ago, the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic at the University of Ottawa brought a complaint against Facebook to the Privacy Commissioner.

“They say they’re purely a social networking site, but they’re in fact a commercial enterprise that is about sharing and using the personal information of its members with advertisers and third-party application developers,” says Philippa Lawson, director of CIPPIC.

The case was built by CIPPIC law interns over the last four months.

A few months before that, this thought provoking video — about what happens to your data on social networking sites like Facebook — was posted by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

The video warns of how social networking sites are a goldmines for those who want to use the data shared by users for any number of benign and perhaps not-so-benign ends – so Facebook isn’t about you, it’s about your data.

Here’s an explanation from the blog post that announced the video:

It’s becoming obvious that a lot of Canadians – and others – are signing over their privacy rights to these companies in exchange for access to increasingly popular social networks.

This is a choice they can make, but we would hope that people would take a minute to think about their choices – and how much information they end up handing over to corporations, advertisers and marketing companies.

Idle speculation: I wonder if this video helped to give them the idea for the complaint?

Read Full Post »

I was chatting with a colleague about that article in yesterday’s Citizen on the challenges around attracting young people to Govt jobs. He was wondering whether social networking sites like Facebook were an appropriate space for the Govt to be in.

My thinking is that if that’s where the people you want to reach are at, then that’s where you have to go to get their attention. Here’s another secondhand quote from what the Youthography guy was saying:

[Young people value] relationships, communication, information, diversity and empowerment, and technology knits it all together for them. With the Internet and digital technology, today’s youth have created seismic changes in how society creates, consumes and manages culture and communications.

And don’t forget the bit about Facebook being “the most important networking technology in [young people's] lives.”

Contrast this with a federal government that bans workplace access to Facebook and other social networks, that is — notable exception aside — almost entirely silent on the social media front, that often appears clueless about online culture.

So here’s the kernel of an idea:

On Facebook, use the Groups feature to set up an info-sharing forum for GoC careers. It’d be about how the federal hiring process works, what all those funny words mean, what the GoC does and how it works. Aimed at recent grads or twentysomethings who would be interested in or curious about a PS career. Seed with content from from other GoC souces – there’s lots of stuff already created (and translated) that’s available, it’s just scattered around. Example: stories that profile what different bureaucrats do in the civil service — many internal employee newsletters already regularly create features like these.

Welcome questions from group members, encourage them to share. Keep it at a high level — not so much about recruiting for specific jobs (and definitely not about giving people an inside track). Definitely about providing clear, objective and factual info on how to research GoC jobs, the staffing process, the breadth of career options, etc.

In the interests of keeping info accessible to those outside the FB network, content could be pushed to or pulled from a GoC hosted blog or website.

Come to think of it, doing a GoC wide thing might be too daunting for starters – so you could pick a smaller slice to start with – like the communications community f’r instance ;+)

So anyhow, this idea is a way to attain cheap reach – content creation costs would be minimal, a lot less than touring around the country to attend job fairs and whatnot. (Salary costs obviously involved for the folks who are keeping the group active, collecting and generating content, but hey if you are working on the PS renewal file then it’s a no brainer.)

More importantly, this is an attempt at relevance — by just being in the social networking space, you can start working against the impression of a stodgy, hidebound institution for old and grey white folks. Sure there would be a lot of vibes along the lines of “yes GoC staffing is a crazy process, but we are trying here to make things better.” I see no harm in being realistic.

Obvious risks — It’d be a target for cranks, but then anything we do is. Also, you’d have to deal with people looking for an inside track, but make the gound rules clear from the outset. Also tone is key – if not done right, could be seen as condescending or phony. No cheerleading, no spin, no b.s.

Obviously this is far from fully thought through. But is it a reasonable starting point?

Update: here’s an example from the private sector of a successful recruiting strategy on Facebook – the Ernst & Young Careers group on Facebook. Looks a lot like the kind of thing I had in mind…

Read Full Post »

Spotted in today’s Ottawa Citizen: Max Valiquette, head honcho at Youthography in Toronto (“We eat, sleep and breathe youth culture like no other agency on the continent” – helped put together the stupid.ca campaign), was speaking to “a bunch of old, grey haired white guys” (read: senior execs in the federal bureaucracy) about why young people don’t connect with the idea of working for the man public service.

He said the government has many strikes against it. It’s a big, slow, rules-bound hierarchy, and it’s not going to attract anyone with the pay. Young people don’t connect to government and can’t fathom many departments would actually forbid employees from using Facebook, “the most important networking technology in their lives” at work. They expect to have control over their lives, rather than work under the thumb of top-down government.

It’s OK, Max. I work for the silly service myself, and I can’t fathom why we aren’t allowed to use Facebook either. But on the bright side, it’s not being actively blocked here (yet).

Read Full Post »

Crazy list of Facebook appsWas reading a report the other day on some focus testing recently undertaken for the Public Health Agency of Canada on concepts for an HIV/AIDS awareness campaign aimed at males 18-25. Focus groups were held in Toronto and Montreal. For more detail on the testing methodology and what the concepts look like, here’s the report – it’s a PDF file.

A couple of the campaign concepts tested included Facebook applications – so this piqued my interest in both cases, participants in the testing gave the ideas a resounding fail. Here’s the summary for one of the concept’s Facebook application idea (a game called “attack of the drones”):

The Facebook application was not well received by focus group participants in either Toronto or Montreal. Many indicated that they are on Facebook but they do not actively use it, nor would they invite their friends to install or load this application on their page. Participants suggested that Facebook has become more of a tool to keep in touch with their friends, hence the lack of desire to install applications. [my emphasis]

The report also quotes a participant: “I don’t install apps in Facebook.”

The summary for the other concept with a Facebook component (this time it’s a quiz for raising awareness about HIV/AIDS) continues in the same vein:

Once again the Facebook approach didn’t resonate at all with participants. They indicated they would likely not post this quiz on their Facebook page and would not be willing to pass it on to their friends. There were of course some participants that would do the quiz, however, they didn’t see the point of having it in Facebook.

From my own experience of Facebook apps, I have found that they are for the most part annoying. Looks like it’s not just me — even among a core Facebook demographic, there is little willingness to install and share applications on this platform. Facebook apps just aren’t the way to go for marketing efforts.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.