I attended via conference call yesterday’s GoC Web 2.0 Communincations Community (GCpedia link) event featuring Brendan Hodgson from Hill and Knowlton. He was speaking about how news breaks online and what this means for crisis communications. He led us through the fantastic material he had collected in the wake of the US Airways Flight 1549 crash into the Hudson river in New York:
Tweets during the event were hashtagged – here they are via a Twitter Search for #w2cc. Mostly me blabbing away, with a few others piping up from time to time. For posterity, I’m collecting my own below with added links and additional info where relevant.
NB I joined the call a tad late due to technical glitches, so I didn’t catch the first bit.
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: media consumption growing massively, but fragmentation also – so trad media suffering 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet
|
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: ec. crisis exacerbates issues for trad media – we don’t need to rely on “the media” to share info 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet
|
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: loss of journalistic control over info marketplace – increase in “noise” in comms environment 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet
|
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: for govt comms, also opportunity to use our own sites w/o relying on “the media” 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
So this is about the disintermediation theme — how the rise of the participatory web has disrupted media models, and then the current economic crisis has come along further destroying revenue, creating a perfect storm for the traditional news media. And opportunity for governments and other organizations to reach directly their audiences without relying on newspapers and TV broadcasters.
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc: Brendan: sensationalism, speculation on the rise – culture of misinformation 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet
|
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: misinfomation, speculation: can escalate issues into crisis very easily. need to be more transparent to fill credibility void 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet
|
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc: comms shops no longer the voice of the org. all employees are communicators now given participatory web 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
By “culture of misinformation,” I got the feeling that Brendan was referring as much to the traditional news media as to disgruntled employees powered by easy access to blogging technology. The idea being that newspapers and TV/radio networks are becoming more shrill, more sensationalistic in an effort to be heard in an increasingly crowded media environment.
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: speed is the new imperative – think response to Motrin moms issue – ballooned into comms crisis over a weekend 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet
|
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: guard against overreaction. social mediasphere can balloon minor issues 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
Overreaction: Brendan noted that the “motrin moms” issue was about a poorly made commercial getting negative reactions in the blogosphere. Nobody was dying or losing their homes or anything. Motrin did react appropriately IMO — they responded within a few days with a straightforward apology, and removed the ad.
For some good info on the Motrin moms swarm, see this post from Jeremiah Owyang.
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: activitists, stakeholders getting creative w/ misinformation (think parodies, spoofs) 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
I didn’t catch everything here. Brendan mentioned some activists who had created a parody of a US government site (snagging the site’s look and feel) during the Bali climate change talks and issued a satirical news relase on it, which apparently fooled a lot of people. This caused the owners of the *real* site to spend a lot of time dealing with this crisis… when they should have been focusing on the Bali talks themselves. Would love to get some links for this, as I’m not familiar with this example and it sounds like a really good one for government communications.
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: public apology via social media: authenticity (think JetBlue, Dell)- can help build empathy, understanding w/ stakeholders 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: social media allows you to be creative in reaction to crisis. e.g Maple Leaf Foods “reputation recovery site” post-lister … 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
Re: Maple Leaf Foods — the honesty and transparency shown by company president Michael McCain was important here, including immediately going to YouTube with this statement and video of the cleanup effort. McCain showed good leadership in dealing with the issue. Info on the extent of Maple Leaf’s reputation rebound: near 30% rise in opinion rating from August 2008 to January 2009. Oh and here’s a good piece on the crisis from the Globe and Mail.
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: show don’t just tell. Use images, video, not just words or text 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan:google, youtube effect: everything the org has said or done will live forever. potential for long term damage to org’l rep … 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: employees as brand guardians – guide them on appropriate online conduct. also beware rogue employees 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
This last tweet: hope for the best, plan for the worst :+)
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: how do we adapt strategies given all this? threats, opportunities can come from anywhere 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: where is the org vulnerable to social media risks? how when and where do you engage online influencers? 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: how can we be more effective in using digital tech to communicate? can you act now and ask forgiveness later? 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: trad media still important. so our jobs now that much harder: SM added on top of all this 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
Online communications and social media does not yet get enough attention from the federal government (are you surprised?) — public service communicators are still very much focused on traditional media relations. Scant attention being paid to online communications. What I mean is that while there may be lots of online publishing on government web sites, very little attention gets paid to what’s going on in the wider web. This is changing though, as events like this one show.
At this point, the presentation moved into Qs and As. A few highlights:
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: during heat of crisis – don’t allow commenting on your site. too much distraction 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: get out of the media mindset! anyone can be a broadcaster in their own right now. no need to wait for the media 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
Back to the disintermediation theme again… looks like it’s one of Brendan’s favourites :+)
It’s true that web 2.0 has made it possible for government communicators to connect directly with our audiences and stakeholders. Collectively, we are only just beginning to see that online communications means more than the corporate website. But implementation will be a challenge, since disintermediation also has brought fragmentation. So we need to do our homework, so we don’t goof up as we approach “being our own broadcaster.” Can’t just slap an RSS feed on our sites and hope for the best…
And here’s a few last tweets from the Q and A session:
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc from audience: need to go back to standing crisis comms plans and see how can add the social media layer to that (big challenge IMO) 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: sr mgrs need to understand why soc med is important 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: monitoring first, then weigh decision to engage (credibility, authority of poster or commenter) 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
| spaghetti_p: #w2cc Brendan: sustainability of social media – think like a managing editor or a publisher – dedicate resources to it 1 day ago from twhirl · Reply · View Tweet |
Tod Maffin on the Web Swarm
Posted in blogosphere, social media, strategy, tactics, Web 2.0, tagged comments, crisis communications, IABC, Tod Maffin, web swarm, web2.0 on 22 July 2008 | 8 Comments »
Swarm of starlings in evening sky -- loud and skittish
(Source: vapour trail on Flickr)
Attended Tod Maffin’s talk on the “web swarm” via IABC webinar today. Basically he was looking at doing crisis communications in today’s online environment.
What is a web swarm? As I understood it, it’s basically when a bunch of people congregate in one spot on the web to basically trash a given target, be it a politician, a company, a brand, an individual or whatever. (Here’s some examples.) Common swarm spots include social news sites like Digg or Reddit, social networks like Facebook, YouTube, and in the blogosphere or on forums – anywhere that people can contribute comments, links or other content.
(It’s basically similar to the concept of the “blog storm,” but expanded to include all the other places on the participatory web that are not commonly understood as being part of the blogosphere.)
Tod provided a handy methodology for crafting response posts when dealing with a web swarm.
This is a convenient checklist for how to actually go into the swarm and hopefully calm the waters.
But he said something else that I found interesting about operating in this environment. Basically that most of the time you should comment only once. So if for instance, there’s a swarm happening on Digg, you should only drop a single comment in the thread. And then you are out.
Not sure I completely agree here. I do understand that there’s a need to avoid being drawn into a tit-for-tat debate on details. And that a decent, timely response will get amplified as some posters in the swarm start to take your part. But I don’t think that a single comment dropped in a lively thread will satisfy the more aggressive participants – it could even give them more ammunition to keep up the pressure.
Maybe it’s because I work for The Man, a very large and very easy target that basically doesn’t “get it.” But I could imagine that continued silence after the initial comment may also do more harm then good. It’ll make that human, conciliatory post you made look insincere, incomplete. Again government not listening.
I guess I’m wondering that to be really successful in dealing with the swarm, a bit more of a sustained presence will be necessary?
Read Full Post »