The other day, the local paper published (yet another) piece on the frequency of staff turnover in the federal public service.
I received an email today from a fellow public servant about this story. They have kindly allowed me to reproduce it:
Hi there, Not sure if you have already read this, but wanted to share this article with you from the Ottawa Citizen on March 31.
Article:
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/focus+attention+turnover+within/1446275/story.html
Comment stream only:
http://communities.canada.com/ottawacitizen/blogs/soundoff/archive/2009/03/31/282766.aspx
I went back today to send it to a colleague and re-read the comments which had more than doubled in number. I found it particularly interesting how public servants are contributing to the dialogue happening outside of our walls. Not like a letter to the editor which may or may not be published. But rather, published instantaneously. This is one of the best examples I have seen of Canadian public servants participating in an outside dialogue as public servants and as individual citizens. Public servants no longer need to start a blog or ask permission from their departments to share their opinions, they seem to be doing so in responding directly to the media, however anonymously they are doing so.
Food for thought: We sometimes think about how public servants should participate in social media – the limits of what they say that could be damaging to the business of government and we generally use the code of values and ethics. Acknowledging that these public servants are contributing to a very important dialogue on this issue, if we are trying to renew public service and compete for the best and the brightest in the knowledge economy, we may eventually need to participate in the dialogue and share what is good about working in the federal public service through comment streams.
UK has civil participation guidelines (attached) and here:
http://beta.civilservice.gov.uk/about/work/codes/participation-online.aspx
. Not sure what their experience has been with news stories and their staff commenting.
This is a neat insight, as a lot of the angst around use of social media in government centers on the idea of blogging or tweeting bureaucrats. But now that most major news sites have added minimally moderated commenting, the bar has been lowered even further and there’s virtually no barrier to participation in high profile conversations online.
Need to think about this more, as I generally welcome increased online participation by my peers. However, in this case particularly, a quick perusal of the comment stream leaves me disappointed. There’s a lot of common stereotypes about the federal PS being reinforced. And some misguided generational angst thrown in for good measure. As is common on news sites, this story appears to be a magnet for folks with axes to grind.
(Not saying there’s not a problem with staff turnover — there clearly is. A 42% annual churn rate is a bit crazy. More that the tone I’m seeing here is not exactly constructive. )

We Still Haven’t Learned How to Use Social Media
Posted in bureaucracy, government, social media, tagged comments, legal liability, online commenting on 8 October 2009 | 5 Comments »
During yesterday’s GTEC session on the Public Sector Social Workplace, I tweeted:
At the time, this sounded like a good tactic to keep in mind when selling social media adoption in the workplace. After all, not needing training means lower costs associated with the roll-out of social tools in the org.
But then I opened up the paper (yes the print kind – gasp!) this morning to the following headline: “27% blind to online legalities – Many Canadians don’t know they’re liable for comments: Poll.”
So, a good reminder — at least some of us haven’t really learned how to use social media after all.
I’d say that this is due to the mental models we bring to participating online. Often we approach it the same way as if we were having a face to face conversation. To wit:
But sometimes we use online mediation as a shield, thinking we can get away with being more outspoken online:
I’d wager that it’s a rare person who hasn’t tweeted something they never would have said out loud to another.
Bottom line: social media is not the same as face-to-face conversation. When you comment online, your words can have real-world consequences. People will still need to be reminded of this as the org goes social.
Getting back to the question of training: while it might be true in a strict sense that people won’t necessarily need training on how to use social media (with most social software, it’s blindingly obvious where you are supposed to click or type), it’s still pretty key to educate users on the norms and risks associated with participating online.
Read Full Post »