• Home
  • About
  • Blogroll
  • Stats

Spaghetti Testing | Peter Smith

Throw it against the wall, see if it sticks.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« @StatsCan Comes Alive
Usability = Brand »

Breaking the #gc20 Twitterbot

25 January 2010 by Peter

Energizer bunny

It just kept going and going and going and ...

At the end of last week, I made some tweaks to the #gc20 twitterbot I built — and today, the @gc_20 account started re-tweeting the same stuff over and over. Obviously stuck in a loop of some kind.

Of course, my little bot blew up while I was attending a training session — so I was nowhere near a PC for the whole day. At break this afternoon I made a valiant attempt to kill off the account via mobile, but that didn’t work — I kept getting errors partway through the confirmation process, so I couldn’t finish the job properly.

So it just kept on keeping on – as robots will when there’s nobody around to take care of them.

I’ve now managed (I think) to turn it off. About 15 hours after it started spewing garbage. That’s a long time in a 24-7, always on, realtime world.

Takeaway: when you are experimenting in Twitter, there’s nowhere to hide when things go wrong.

So if you are doing this kind of thing while representing your org, then it’s really important to keep close tabs on your creations — especially when you change how they work. And to make a contingency plan. Neither of which I did. ‘Course I created this thing without much forethought either. It was just a little experiment in getting the hang of building a hashtag bot. Which is another no-no if you are doing this more seriously — did I mention that it’s not a good idea to be going about this without a plan?

Anyhow, credit to my network — a couple of folks tipped me off (thanks !), otherwise @gc_20 might still be re-tweeting madly. Also credit to my peeps for not chewing me out for screwing it up. Then again, maybe they’re just practicing what mama taught them — “if you don’t have anything nice to say, then don’t say anything at all.”

Still, if I was an org, this could have been very damaging. Annoying the audience is never a good idea.

Image credit: Creativity+ on Flickr

Advertisement

Rate this:

Share this:

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in social media, strategy, tactics | Tagged #gc20, bots, feeds, hashtags, twitter | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on 26 January 2010 at 12:06 am Robin Majumdar

    No, annoying the audience is never a good idea, but in this case @gc_20 and #gc20 have their value proposition (and audience) pretty well defined and this is pretty bleeding edge in the big scheme of things. So basically; no damage done.

    It would be something to suggest at the recently announced Twitter Conference (geared towards devs) to have a sandbox environment… à la PayPal, eBay, etc.

    Great job with #gc20


    • on 26 January 2010 at 8:20 am Peter.Smith@ic.gc.ca

      Thanks Robin. Totally agree, a space to test and experiment would be nice.

      P



Comments are closed.

  • Welcome!

    Occasional thoughts on web and government communications. Everything here by Peter Smith.

    Spaghetti test? What's a spaghetti test?

  • Receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 9 other followers

  • My Delicious

  • Archives

  • Creative Commons

    Creative Commons License
    Spaghetti Testing by Peter Smith is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com
  • Header Credit

    Header image: Sketties, by Allie's.Dad on Flickr
  • Networked Blogs

    NetworkedBlogs
    Blog:
    Spaghetti Testing
    Topics:
    government, social media, canada
     
    Follow my blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com